11
Reverse engineering doesn't mean it's something illegal. But yeah, some people think RE=cracking and pirating.
Revolutionary is great, I like it
Revolutionary is great, I like it
Recent Posts
12
You're right, "HIPS" stands for Host Intrusion Prevention System. And "Re" is up to youHmm I think that could have a negative connotation, you know, for a broader market and marketing purposes.
For the latter purpose I like Revolutionary instead. Pretty much.
13
It's weird i see the same people in every location. LOL!rofl
14
You're right, "HIPS" stands for Host Intrusion Prevention System. And "Re" is up to you Initially it was for Reverse Engineering as we're also working in this field.
Initially it was for Reverse Engineering as we're also working in this field.15
It's weird i see the same people in every location. LOL!
17
Question for fixer:
What does ReHIPS stand for?
Perhaps Revolutionary Host Intrusion Prevention System?
What does ReHIPS stand for?
Perhaps Revolutionary Host Intrusion Prevention System?
18
Other / Re: New users
« Last post by shmu26 on February 06, 2019, 05:38:37 pm »Welcome, @dinosaur07 !
19
Developers' Blog / Re: [FAQ] This annoying yet secure separate desktop
« Last post by fixer on February 04, 2019, 05:19:57 pm »Security is based on three big whales: confidentiality, integrity, availability.
Isolated hooks vs Separate desktop is basically Usability vs Security. Having an untrusted program on the main desktop introduces some threats like possible screenshots or sometimes intercepted pressed keys. It doesn't affect integrity and availability, but may affect confidentiality. I know, with blocked network access it's quite far fetched that it can communicate with some other isolated program with network access. So for 99.99% it should be OK. For the rest 0.01% totally paranoid separate desktop is always there
But it should be set by user. We can't deny network access in initial rules as it may result in blocked cloud communication.
Isolated hooks vs Separate desktop is basically Usability vs Security. Having an untrusted program on the main desktop introduces some threats like possible screenshots or sometimes intercepted pressed keys. It doesn't affect integrity and availability, but may affect confidentiality. I know, with blocked network access it's quite far fetched that it can communicate with some other isolated program with network access. So for 99.99% it should be OK. For the rest 0.01% totally paranoid separate desktop is always there
But it should be set by user. We can't deny network access in initial rules as it may result in blocked cloud communication.
20
Developers' Blog / Re: [FAQ] This annoying yet secure separate desktop
« Last post by shmu26 on February 04, 2019, 04:52:59 pm »Thanks for this informative blog post.
Regarding MS Office, it seems to need desktop hooks, and it doesn't like running at low integrity level. But what about isolated hooks? What is the reason not to set isolated hooks for MS Office?
Isolated hooks + deny internet connection seems to be a good way to lock down MS Office.
Regarding MS Office, it seems to need desktop hooks, and it doesn't like running at low integrity level. But what about isolated hooks? What is the reason not to set isolated hooks for MS Office?
Isolated hooks + deny internet connection seems to be a good way to lock down MS Office.